Re: Can We place Traps as part of Tables
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 31/10/06, santhosh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please post the output of walking the table, and I'll give you the > > exact configuration required to generate suitable traps. > > Definetly, but the total output of my private enterprises MIB's is around > 350 OID's > > here shown is the output of alarm table only > > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.1.2 = INTEGER: 2 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.1.3 = INTEGER: 3 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.1.4 = INTEGER: 4 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.1.5 = INTEGER: 5 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.2.1 = INTEGER: 0 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.2.2 = INTEGER: 0 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.2.3 = INTEGER: 0 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.2.4 = INTEGER: 0 > .1.3.6.1.4.1.17887.7.6.1.2.5 = INTEGER: 0 [snip] <Sigh> I'd rather expected that you would have loaded your MIB before walking the table, so that the output would be vaguely meaningful. You can't realistically expect me to do anything with a list of arbitrary numbers! What is the condition that should trigger a trap? What are the OID(s) that we should be looking at, and what are the significant values? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users