Re: 5.4 snmptrap apparently broken
"Adam Welch" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you. ,Adam On 2/13/07, Thomas Anders <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adam Welch wrote: > > I have had success reverting to 5.3.1. Sending traps (v1 and > > v2(notification)) via 5.3 snmptrap has worked where 5.4 snmptrap never > did. > > I can send from 5.3 and receive from either 5.3 or 5.4 snmptrapd which > > indicates to me that the full problem is probably in the snmptrap.citself > > although I have not troubleshot this to the code level. > > Known bug in 5.4. See http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1620424 . > The workaround is to specify "hostname:162" (i.e. with an explicit port > number) instead of just "hostname". > > > +Thomas > > -- > Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users