Re: Issue with IP-FORWARD-MIB and other standard mibs
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/02/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > The issue I see is one particular test case fails on IP-FORWARD-MIB. > The testcase tries to do a set on these mib variables and expects a response > "noError". > But currently the response it gets is "notWritable" The most likely cause of that is that the agent probably doesn't implement SET support for these particular objects. > From the mib definition, it reads that these mibs have access read-write. No - they have *MAX* access read-write. That doesn't automatically mean that the agent contains the code necessary to support SET requests. It's fairly common to implement a read-only view of a MIB table. Reporting the current state is much easier than updating it. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users