Re: What *should* Net-SNMP do with a busted resource?
"Phil Smith III" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009c01c761c5$925a46f0$0202a8c0@SmithT40> |
Peter Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >Having experienced similar failures over the years,(with my own agent >code as well - blush), I would say, the agent should be designed to be >robust in the face of badly behaved or wrongly configured systems. After >all, typing 'cat xyz' does not crash the shell if xyz is missing, so >querying a resource that is broken should not crash the agent. >Having to go round and restart several hundred agents on remote systems >because someone queried a broken resource is not time well spent. Thank you. I absolutely agree; my query was in case there was some subtlety that I was missing that would suggest that the current behavior is correct. You have confirmed my position -- always a popular choice ;-) Cheers, ...phsiii ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users