Re: What *should* Net-SNMP do with a busted resource?

"Phil Smith III" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <009c01c761c5$925a46f0$0202a8c0@SmithT40>
Peter Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>Having experienced similar failures over the years,(with my own agent 
>code as well - blush), I would say, the agent should be designed to be 
>robust in the face of badly behaved or wrongly configured systems. After 
>all, typing 'cat xyz' does not crash the shell if xyz is missing, so 
>querying a resource that is broken should not crash the agent.
>Having to go round and restart several hundred agents on remote systems 
>because someone queried a broken resource is not time well spent.

Thank you. I absolutely agree; my query was in case there was some subtlety that I was missing that would suggest that the current behavior is correct.  You have confirmed my position -- always a popular choice ;-)

Cheers,

...phsiii


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.