Re: Monitoring disk usage
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 22/03/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The other possibility would be to set up a "monitor" entry on > > > dskUsed. Slightly forced, but a delta monitor compared against > > > 0 might fo the trick. > > > > That sounds great but I admit the snmpd.conf man page isn't > > sufficiently clear to me for me to do that. Got any examples? > > Untested but: > > monitor -D .... dskUsed > 0 > ... I can't get these traps to fire. Then again, when I try to walk dskTable, I get a failiure response so maybe that MIB isn't in my agent. But I tried with memTotalFree and nothing happens. /usr/share/snmpd/snmpd.conf contains: agentSecName internal rouser internal monitor -r 30 memTotalFree < 2500 and when I look at the system I see: ~ # grep -i memfree /proc/meminfo MemFree: 1848 kB and when I try to get memTotalFree with snmpwalk, I get meaningful values. But never a trap. How can I diagnose the problem? I looked at versionConfigureOptions and there doesn't seem to be anything there that disables these traps (or dskTable, for that matter). I've tried running snmpd -f but it doesn't complain about any unknown options or anything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users