RE: Reducing Risk of Missing SNMP Traps

"John Giaccotto" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <6B3727B1924AC94F915E95DC9063EFFA087F2A3D@norwalk-ex1.ad.adeptra.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 3:25 PM
To: John Giaccotto
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reducing Risk of Missing SNMP Traps

On 14/05/07, John Giaccotto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can anyone provide some advice on how to minimize the risk that a trap
may
> not arrive at its destination?  Is there an accepted method for
ensuring
> that a trap does not get dropped or if it does that the sending
component is
> made aware of this?

Use  SNMPv2c or SNMPv3, and send an INFORM instead of a TRAP.

Thanks for your response.  What is the general practice for dealing with
this when the traps are emitted from a software component which is not
capable of keeping track of responses to INFORM messages?  In our case
we are mostly emitting traps from a log4j Appender and from various Perl
and Bash scripts.  


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.