Re: net-snmp slow with kernel 2.6.x

Cédric Molinier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <002001c8194d$c41cb110$0a01a8c0@cedric>
Hi,

 >For the moment, I tested net-snmp 5.0.9 and 5.2.1;
> Both of those versions are really, really, really stale and no longer in
> development.
> Have you considered 5.4.1?

Yes, I just test 5.4.1 with uClinux kernel 2.6.x.
It works, but response time of snmp server is not performant (80 ms).

>But ... response time with net-snmp ... are ... 80 ms...2.6.x...on
> 2.4.x ...less 1 ms.
> What, exactly, are you asking net-snmp to do?  Is there a specific
MIB
> you're looking at?

I use net-snmp like server snmp on my embedded app. And my application needs
good
performance of snmp server (and I must add a specific MIB). Too, snmp server
must
send traps.

For the test: my SNMP manager sends (each second) a GET request only on
"sysObjectId" variable of mibII, and
with Ethereal, I measure response time of snmp server.

I would like my snmp server (here, net-snmp) to be faster with kernel 2.6.x.

Thanks you for your advices
Best regards

Cedric



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.