Re: possible bug in getnext implementation
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Calling snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.1 to get index > no. 1 works fine. > It works fine for indexes up to 8. > Trying snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.9 resulted in > skipping to the next column. How is your table indexed? By a string, or an integer value? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users