RE: possible bug in getnext implementation
"Rotem Tzuk" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks a lot This was very helpful Rotem -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 7:03 PM To: Rotem Tzuk Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: possible bug in getnext implementation On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm trying to use snmpset to set values in table. > I use snmpset ... MyMIB::MyVal.1 = newVal For now this does not work. > Is this the correct way to do it? If you are using string-valued indexes, then no - this won't work. You must use the same style indexes are returned from walking the table. i.e. something like snmpset .... MyMIB::myVal.\"Station1\" = newVal [Note that MIB object names *must* start with a lower case letter] Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users