RE: General security usage question
"Mike Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <83E753BE7B6A324ABB336245BAF1DAAC07BE599E@mailserver.metatv-ds.metatv.com> |
> From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Davin > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:59 AM > I'd > stick with > 2c unless you have a real reason to use 1, and I don't belief this > qualifies. I don't know why you'd say this. Almost anything which supports SNMP supports SNMPv1, and many don't support anything else. SNMPv2c, on the other hand, is a well supported myth. For read-only SNMP, a v1 community named "public" is the de facto standard. You should not support community based writing unless the customer demands it, as it is insecure. > It is worth mentioning that USM and VACM, which are only available in > v3, In net-snmp, VACM works on communities as well as users. HTH, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users