RE: [Fwd: Re: related tables design]
"Mike Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <83E753BE7B6A324ABB336245BAF1DAAC07C63A56@mailserver.metatv-ds.metatv.com> |
> From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Xuan Pan > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:03 AM > [DHCP settings table] > index poolName serverIp rowStatus > 1 testPool x.x.x.x 1 > 2 testPool1 x.x.x.x 1 > 4 testPool2 x.x.x.x 1 > > [IP Range Table] as augment of entries in DHCP settings table > index startIp endIp > 3 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 > 5 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.3 <- newly added row You misunderstand. The indexes for the IP Range Table must match those of the DHCP Settings table, like so: [DHCP settings table] index poolName serverIp rowStatus 1 testPool a.a.a.a 1 2 testPool1 b.b.b.b 1 4 testPool2 c.c.c.c 1 [IP Range Table] as augment of entries in DHCP settings table index startIp endIp 1 1.1.1.100 1.1.1.199 4 2.2.2.200 2.2.2.249 <- newly added row This tells us that 1.1.1.1xx addresses are assigned to testPool requests, 2.2.2.2xx addresses are assigned to testPool2 requests, and there will be no DHCP addresses in testPool1. Kapische? Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users