Re: [Fwd: Re: related tables design]
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/01/2008, Mike Ayers <[email protected]> wrote: > If you really are doing a table of DHCP ranges, are you sure you need to > augment each interface with a table of values? It seems to me that a DHCP > server would only have one range to serve, an thus the second index would be > moot. It depends on your network configuration. We've got three separate networks within our department (and hence three separate IP ranges), but with two DHCP servers to cover them. So one of those servers has two distinct ranges to work with. And we were toying with a significantly more complex setup. Never underestimate the ingenuity (or sheer wierdness!) of the network community! Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users