Should we send authenticationFailure traps when auth fails when using SNMPv3
"Buchupalli, Sasidevi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F99CA9DBE8329449BB60D4DD246012170C42F654@USNVEX1.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> |
In SNMPv1 and v2c, if there is any authentication failure on the agent, it can send an authenticationFailure trap to the sender of the SNMP request. Shouldn't we be doing the same even in the case of an SNMPv3 agent. The RFC seems to be vague or left it to the implementation of the calling module, as what to do in this case. If we need to be backwards compatible to v1 or v2c, I don't see why the calling module shouldn't be sending an authenticationFailure trap, in the above case, even in SNMPv3. Any clarification is highly appreciated. Thanks ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users