RE: access control
"Masoud Fatollahy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | T2 Data AB |
| Message-ID | <000001c87542$ac2b9d90$0482d8b0$@se> |
Hi again and thanks for your time. We have test this configuration and couldn't make it work with context. As soon as we using username + password + context from mib-browser, we can't get access and receive Authentication error. But if we don't use context for other users then everything works find. The strange things is that when we are using the old access control with out view-base, (i.e rouser rocommunity etc) together with our context, then everything works fine. Since we want to the new access control and have more control over the nodes and objects tree, we need to make this work. So I will be very happy and thanksful if you could help me to localize the problem. Where in the code should I dig in to find out what is happing when we use different context and what has it with authentication of the user to do? Has anyone done any test for this scenario? Regards, /Masoud -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: den 22 februari 2008 11:03 To: Mike Ayers Cc: Masoud Fatollahy; Masoud Fatollahy; [email protected] Subject: Re: access control On 21/02/2008, Mike Ayers <[email protected]> wrote: > > com2sec cust1_sec 192.168.55.0/24 public > > com2sec cust2_sec 192.168.56.0/24 public > > > Note that the community "public" will now have acces to both > cust1_sec rights and cust2_sec rights, so customers 1 and 2 > can see each other's data. Are you sure about that, Mike? Presumably customer 1 will be coming in from the network 192.168.55.x so will be mapped to the internal user "cust1_sec", and hence given access to the 'cust1_v' view. Similarly for customer 2 (on network 192.168.56.x) and the 'cust2_v' view. That relies on the two customers sticking to their own networks, of course, but I believe this setup should provide the separation that Masoud is looking for. Disclaimer: I haven't actually tested this, so I Could Be Wrong. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users