RE: access control

"Masoud Fatollahy" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Organization T2 Data AB
Message-ID <000001c87542$ac2b9d90$0482d8b0$@se>
Hi again and thanks for your time.

We have test this configuration and couldn't make it work with context. As
soon as we using username + password + context from mib-browser, we can't
get access and receive Authentication error. But if we don't use context for
other users then everything works find. 
The strange things is that when we are using the old access control with out
view-base, (i.e rouser rocommunity etc) together with our context, then
everything works fine. 
Since we want to the new access control and have more control over the nodes
and objects tree, we need to make this work. So I will be very happy and
thanksful if you could help me to localize the problem. Where in the code
should I dig in to find out what is happing when we use different context
and what has it with authentication of the user to do?

Has anyone done any test for this scenario?

Regards,

/Masoud

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: den 22 februari 2008 11:03
To: Mike Ayers
Cc: Masoud Fatollahy; Masoud Fatollahy; [email protected]
Subject: Re: access control

On 21/02/2008, Mike Ayers <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > com2sec cust1_sec 192.168.55.0/24  public
>  > com2sec cust2_sec 192.168.56.0/24  public
>
>
>         Note that the community "public" will now have acces to both
>   cust1_sec rights and cust2_sec rights, so customers 1 and 2
>   can see each other's data.

Are you sure about that, Mike?

Presumably customer 1 will be coming in from the network
192.168.55.x  so will be mapped to the internal user "cust1_sec",
and hence given access to the 'cust1_v' view.

Similarly for customer 2 (on network 192.168.56.x) and the
'cust2_v' view.

That relies on the two customers sticking to their own networks,
of course, but I believe this setup should provide the separation
that Masoud is looking for.

Disclaimer:  I haven't actually tested this, so I Could Be Wrong.

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.