Re: Problem with linkUpDownNotifications
Thomas Anders <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave Shield wrote: > On 18/04/2008, Thomas Anders <[email protected]> wrote: >> Then, still, shouldn't the disman code work independent of MIBS settings? > > If it's set up using numeric OIDs, then yes - it would. > If it's configured using MIB object names, then it relies on the > library MIB parser to translate those names into numeric OIDs. > > Remember that it's just the snmpd.conf processing that's relevant > here. The DisMan tables themselves work with numeric OIDs. I fully agree that's how it should work. But didn't the original poster say that just including "linkUpDownNotifications yes" in snmpd.conf triggered the ifOperStatus error? Here's a quick test: foo# env MIBS="" /path/to/snmpd --linkupdownnotifications=yes --agentsecname=_internal --rouser=_internal --rocommunity=foobar -C -c /dev/null -f -Le localhost:8161 trigger OID: ifOperStatus : line 0: Error: unknown monitor OID trigger OID: ifOperStatus : line 0: Error: unknown monitor OID [...] Am I missing something obvious? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users