Re: snmp version

"snmp girl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
thanks a lot Dave , now I get the difference .
2008/4/19, Dave Shield <[email protected]>:
>
> On 19/04/2008, snmp girl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am being confused , when should i use v1 or v 2c or even v3?
>
> You should use SNMPv3 when you are concerned about security.
> This version includes an authentication mechanism which ensures
> that a request or response has been sent from the system you
> expect (i.e. protects against spoofing), and hasn't been altered
> in transit (i.e. protects against tampering).
>   It also includes an encryption mechanism, so that requests
> or responses can't be viewed en route.
>
>
> Neither SNMPv1 nor SNMPv2c provide any such guarantees.
> The only "security" (such as it is) is in the use of a supposedly
> unknown community string (although this could be determined
> by capturing network traffic), and in the source address of the
> request (although this could be forged).
>
>
> The main difference between SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c is in
> the protocol operations.   The basic operations are mostly
> the same (Get/GetNext/Set/Trap), but SNMPv2c
> offers two more (GetBulk - a supercharged GetNext,
> and Inform - a Trap+acknowledgement).
>
> SNMPv2c also introduced improved error reporting for GET*
> and SET requests.
>
> If both the client and the agent you are using support SNMPv2c,
> this is generally preferable to SNMPv1, particularly with
> unsuccessful requests.  But there's really not much
> difference between them.
>
> SNMPv3 gives you a lot more security  (as in some, rather
> than none!), but is somewhat more complex to set up and
> to understand.
>
>
>
> > what can be changed if I send a trap with using v1 instead of v 2c ?
>
> The structure of an SNMPv1 trap is significantly different to that
> of SNMPv2.  But the basic information contained is much the same.
> If your trap receiver understands SNMPv2c, then I'd be inclined to
> stick with that - it's conceptually slightly simpler.
>
>
> But fundamentally, the first question is always what version(s)
> the software that you are using understands.   If you're just using
> Net-SNMP programs, you have a choice of all three.  But some
> systems may only understand SNMPv1 or (perhaps less likely)
> only SNMPv3, or some other combination.
>
>
> Dave
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.