RE: some problem : timeout / burst get multi-oid
"Mike Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <83E753BE7B6A324ABB336245BAF1DAAC086DB041@mailserver.metatv-ds.metatv.com> |
> From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Dave Shield > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:56 AM > > 2008/4/28 JAW-Woei MAA <[email protected]>: > > In our knowledge, timeout means the period of responsive > > time after we set > > the packet out. > > In reality, when we work it within the net-snmp, it > > wouldn't need the > > responsive time if it can find host. > > I'm sorry - that still doesn't make much sense. I believe the OP is confusing "timeout" and "interval"[1]. SNMP uses a timeout strategy, which translates[2] to "give up after X seconds have elapsed from the start of query, but end as soon as an answer is received." This sets a *minimimum* rate of traversal. An interval mechanism would be "do not start the next query until at least X seconds have elapsed since the last query was started"[3], which sets a *maximum* rate of traversal. The snmpwalk command does not have interval control. HTH, Mike [1] Dave, you can stop reading here. ;-) [2] This is only one of many interpretations, but the one most useful here. [3] For cheap and/or bandwidth-paranoid implementations, "...since the last query completed". ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users