Re: snmpd creating dirty buffers on a D-Link DFE-580TX [solved]

On Thu, 1 May 2008 22:33:51 +0100
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2008/4/30 richard lucassen <[email protected]>:
> >  Ok, I have a few machines around with this particular NIC. On some
> >  it isn't (wasn't) possible to run snmpd. So I just compiled the
> >  source from Debian unstable (5.4.1) and installed that version. But
> >  unfortunately without result:
>         [snip]
> >
> >  If you really want I can try the latest tarball, but I understand
> >  that this should not make much difference from the 5.4.1 version.
> 
> 
> No, you're quite correct.
> The current development code is no different to the 5.4.1
> distribution.
> 
> I'm attaching a patch (untested) which should address this issue.
> If this helps, we can look at including it within the various code
> lines.

Patch applied. Looks good! No dirty buffer messages anymore! (I applied
this patch to Debian unstable source 5.4.1)

May  2 20:46:07 fw2 snmpd[30198]: netsnmp_assert !"registration !=
duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535 netsnmp_subtree_load()
May  2 20:46:07 fw2 last message repeated 2 times
May  2 20:46:07 fw2 snmpd[30198]: could not open /proc/net/if_inet6
May  2 20:46:07 fw2 snmpd[30198]: NET-SNMP version 5.4.1
May  2 20:47:07 fw2 snmpd[30198]: cannot open /proc/net/snmp6 ...
May  2 20:47:12 fw2 snmpd[30198]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34009
May  2 20:47:15 fw2 last message repeated 225 times

R.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users