Re: Best way to monitor 600 cable modem devices
"Carlos Alberto Bernat Orozco" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Group Thanks Bryan for the answer. I'm kind of a newbie. I haven't used snmp until I installed cacti to monitor some routers which I believed is awesome. How can I know when to use multicast/broadcast vs. unicast? Is there any parameter on the net-snmp package files where I can fix this? If so, for what I understand, is better to use unicast? Sorry for so many questions. Hope not disturbing. Thanks in advanced 2008/7/27 Brian A. Seklecki <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Carlos Alberto Bernat Orozco wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> I was wondering what is the best way to monitor 600 cable modem > > Can you use Broadcast/Multicast, or does it have to be unicast packets? If > so, You'll want to develop a custom multi-threaded daemon instead of the > standard Nagios + check_snmp model. The overhead of the forking model gives > flexibility, not performance. > > ~BAS > >> devices, every 10 seconds ? what about the performance? >> >> The idea is to know the most real time possible monitor if those > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users