Re: Question on MIB design for traps
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2008/9/16 Ben Greear <[email protected]>: > I'm curious if anyone has any suggestions for resources on how > to properly design MIBs, especially traps. > > Basically, I have lots of entities, and each entity has lots of > fields, each of which can be in a few states (often 'BAD' or 'OK') > > It seems I can encode 'entity', 'field', 'value' in a single trap > and have very few traps defined in my MIB, or I could go the opposite > extreme and have one trap for every field + value combination (and > still encode 'entity'). > > I'm interested in the preferred design.. Have a small number of notifications, to indicate a particular category of "event", and define these as taking additional varbinds ('entity', 'field', 'value') as part of the payload. The simplest approach would probably be to have just two traps: somethingHasGoneWrong and doNotWorryEverythingIsSorted (though probably with better names!) Depending on your environment, it might be worth considering a slightly richer set of notifications, but I'd tend to err on the side of fewer rather than lots. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users