Re: why does uint64_t arrive with reverse order in notification?

I am sorry I foggot to out the definition:

uint64_t runtime_task_id;

As I understand I should not use uint64_t...

Thank you.

2009/2/19 Dave Shield <[email protected]>

> 2009/2/19 Alexander Bubnov <[email protected]>:
> > snmp_varlist_add_variable( &notification_vars,
> >      persistent_task_oid, persistent_task_oid_length,
> >     ASN_COUNTER64,
> >     (const u_char *) persistent_task_id_value,
> >                            persistent_task_id_value_length );
>
> What is the definition of the variable 'persistent_task_id_value' ?
> (it's not present in the code fragment you posted)
>
>
> > //runtime_task_id = (runtime_task_id<<32)|(runtime_task_id>>32);
>
> Eh?   What on earth are you trying to do here?!?
>
>
> ASN_COUNTER64 expects a "struct counter" data type.
> Try
>        struct counter64  persistent_task_id_value;
>        persistent_task_id_value.low  = runtime_task_id & 0xffffffff;
>        persistent_task_id_value.high = runtime_task_id >> 32;
>
>
> > subj. is it a bug?
>
> Looks like coder error to me....
>
> Dave
>



-- 
/BR, Alexander

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users