Re: Compatibility for Different version of Net SNMP
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/3/16 sanjaykumar <[email protected]>: > I have another question regarding the mib implementation: > As mib2c generate code for both UCD and netsnmp version. > What is advantage of one above other ? > When we should use UCD based code and when net snmp for Enterprise MIB > implantation ? > Which one we should follow for better compatibility ? If you are writing new module code, then I'd suggest you use the helper-based v5 approach. It's not really sensible to develop new modules using the old UCD style. That's really just there for backward compatability with pre-existing modules. The newer approach is more efficient (since the v4 style is now built on top of it), more flexible (with several helpers to do much of the work for you), and can process multiple varbinds in one go (rather than handling each one individually). There are also known (and inherent) problems with the old-style mib2c config template. If you've got existing code that uses this style, then it's fine to keep with it. But any new code should be written using handlers instead. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users