Re: snmpset
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/4/6 huangweiwei039 <[email protected]>: > But in RFC,the object I handled is R/W. Various objects in the ipRouteTable have a *maximum* access of read-write. That doesn't mean that every agent necessarily implements them as such. > when I use "snmpset" to handle other object which is not in a > table,the result is OK. You haven't said which object, but it seems clear that this particular object *has* been implemented as writeable. > Can you tell me why? The original route implementation was read-only. It simply doesn't include any code to handle SET requests. I'm not sure whether the more recent ipCidrRouteTable includes SET support or not, but it's probably worth a try. Make sure you are using the most recent release for best results. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users