Re: concept like "container" and "helpers"
sanjaykumar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thaks a lot Dave. Yes, I got the general understanding of "container". I am really happy. Now we can go ahead with "Helpers" concept. Sanjay Dave Shield wrote: > Hold on - you're rushing ahead a bit. > You started by saying that you didn't > understand the concepts of "container" and "helper". > > I've tried to explain what a "container" is (in fairly > general terms). Are you happy with that now? > > Note that I'm not asking whether you're comfortable > with how to *use* a container - I'm concentrating on > your understanding of the basic concepts. > > If so, then we can look at "helpers". > > Don't get hung up on how you might use these things > until you're comfortable with what they actually are! > > Dave > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-users mailing list > [email protected] > Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users