RE: Security Posture in net-snmp
"Mike Ayers" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <83E753BE7B6A324ABB336245BAF1DAAC0B7C89F4@mailserver.metatv-ds.metatv.com> |
> From: Pachiappan D [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 8:58 AM > I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1). > > > RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , > 1. minimum-secure > > 2.semi-secure > 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) > > > May i know the security posture in net-snmp ? Security posture is a deplyment issue, not an implementation issue. It is your choice which to use. HTH, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users