Re: Loading V1 Mibs
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/6/15 Sowmya P Venkatesh <[email protected]>: > When I load BGP4-MIB and RFC-1269 MIB then in the tree structure I get > Bgp > Bgp Traps > BgpBackward Transition > BgpEstablished > Bgp# > BgpBackward Transition > BgpEstablished I presume those last two are meant to be indented, as children of 'Bgp#' ? > Is this a problem with Net-SNMP. No. That appears to be down to an inconsistency between the trap definitions in the two MIBs. > Or can we solve this. You can solve this by only loading *one* of these two MIBs. (Preferably BGP4-MIB, although I would criticise their choice of MIB structure for the trap definitions). As I told you last week, you should *not* be loading two equivalent versions of the same MIB. That is just asking for trouble. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users