Re: net-snmp process traps from agent

Dave Shield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2009/6/17 Jansen, Mario <[email protected]>:
> proc "java" 10 1
> proc "snmpdx" 1 1
> defaultMonitors yes
> linkUpDownNotifications yes
> trap2sink naos

Do you have an "iquerySecName"  or "agentSecName" entry?
Does this user have suitable access?
Does this user actually exist?


> According the man page, this should be enough to let the agent monitor the
> logfile / processes when it goes beyond or above an threshold:


> The defaultMonitors directive above is equivalent to a series of (boolean)
> monitor entries:
     [snip]
> and will send a trap whenever any of these entries indicate a problem.


Please note the sentence immediately following:

      In both these latter cases, the snmpd.conf must also contain a
iquerySecName directive,
      together with a corresponding createUser entry and suitable
access control configuration.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.