Re: net-snmp process traps from agent
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/6/17 Jansen, Mario <[email protected]>: > proc "java" 10 1 > proc "snmpdx" 1 1 > defaultMonitors yes > linkUpDownNotifications yes > trap2sink naos Do you have an "iquerySecName" or "agentSecName" entry? Does this user have suitable access? Does this user actually exist? > According the man page, this should be enough to let the agent monitor the > logfile / processes when it goes beyond or above an threshold: > The defaultMonitors directive above is equivalent to a series of (boolean) > monitor entries: [snip] > and will send a trap whenever any of these entries indicate a problem. Please note the sentence immediately following: In both these latter cases, the snmpd.conf must also contain a iquerySecName directive, together with a corresponding createUser entry and suitable access control configuration. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users