ucd-snmp vs. net-snmp (foot print)
Juliana Purjo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello list, I am working on ucd-snmp (version 4.2.6), extending a set of private company MIBs. I have been told the foot-print of ucd-snmp is significantly lower than that of newer 5.x.x series net-snmp - Is this true? If true, how big is the difference, and what would it take to reduce the foot print. The target is embedded Linux network device, so squeezing things down really is necessary. I notice the mib2c is completely rewritten which seems a benefit (I am using customized configuration files and 5.x.x mib2c seems easier to work with). Is there other notable reasons to consider moving to 5.x.x? Juliana _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photo-gallery-edit.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users