回复： 回复： Can snmp support nested tables?
"飞飞" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry,that mail I fogot to CC to the list.pls mail it to Mike,thank you !:0) YES,I want to get some models for modelling,Here is my problem. portal bonding_mode descriptor: --------------------this is a table. components bytes type range unit description -----------------------the entries of the table ge1_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge1 descriptor ge2_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge2 descriptor ge3_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge3 descriptor ge4_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge4 descriptor ge5_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge5 descriptor ge6_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge6 descriptor ge7_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge7 descriptor ge8_des 16 struct ge_descriptor see below 1byte ge8 descriptor bond1_des 16 struct bond_descriptor see below 1byte bond1 descriptor bond2_des 16 struct bond_descriptor see below 1byte bond2 descriptor bond3_des 16 struct bond_descriptor see below 1byte bond3 descriptor bond4_des 16 struct bond_descriptor see below 1byte bond4 descriptor The struct of geN_descriptor : --------------------------the struct of the table's entry component bytes type range unit description ip 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte ip address gateway 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte gateway netmask 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte netmask The struct of bondN_descriptor : component bytes type range unit description ip 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte ip address gateway 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte gateway netmask 4 uint8[4] 0~255.0~255.0~255.0~255 1byte netmask So,My problem is whether the net-snmp MIB table support the composite structure,especially,we want to the table's entry is a struct or another table,How can I deal with this requirement?This is what I call it "promote the potential sub-table as the second table to of the up-level",this is my tough situation,this where "main-table,parallel table processing VS main-table,sub-table(nested table) processing " come from. Thank you Dave,You help me a lot! Alex ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Dave Shield"<[email protected]>; 发送时间: 2009年12月10日(星期四) 晚上7:30 收件人: "飞飞"<[email protected]>; 抄送: "net-snmp-users"<[email protected]>; 主题: Re: 回复： Can snmp support nested tables? [ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] 2009/12/10 飞飞 <[email protected]>: > I decide to promote the potential sub-table as the second table to the > up-level entry.does it has the same function as the sub-table doed(if it > does)? I'm sorry - I don't understand what you are talking about here. Rather than discussing the detailed structure of the MIB tables, why don't you describe whatever it is that you are trying to model here. The structure of a MIB should always be driven by the underlying information that it represents. Without knowing about this, it's impossible to provide sensible advice. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users