Re: Disman event traps
"nf-vale" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Critical Links, Inc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 07 January 2010 18:43:55 Mike Ayers wrote: > > From: nf-vale [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 2:59 PM > > > > The problem I'm facing is that I only receive one trap (either trapsink, > > trap2sink or informsink work the same) if I restart the snmpd agent (I > > suppose > > that if I would force the available disk space to set the dskErrorFlag > > from > > "noerror" to "error" this would work as well, as expected). > > > > So my doubt here is: is this the correct behaviour, or should it send > > one trap > > for each verification cycle, even if the error flag did not change > > between the > > verifications (dskErrorFlag = 1)? > > It should send the trap only for the state change from under to over > threshold. This is desireable to prevent trap flooding during major > problem times (power outage, etc.). Since traps can be lost, you should > supplement the disman monitoring with MIB polling. I suppose it could have one "send a new trap after x time" flag ... may be in a future release :) ?! Thanks for your help Mike. > > > HTH, > > Mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users