Re: if-mib
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2010/2/9 Mike Ayers <[email protected]>: >> Each time a tun falls and rises again, a new entry appears in the >> if-MIB, and it even has the same description! > > OK, that sounds *good* to me... > Not sure what the problem is. PLease clarify. What this sounds like to me, is a situation where the index of the interface keeps changing, whenever the interface is taken down and brought back up again. Something like as follows: $ snmpwalk ifName ifName.27 = "if0" # ifconfig if0 down # ifconfig if1 up $ snmpwalk ifName ifName.39 = "if0" In general, this has tended to occur with dial-up connections or tunnels, where it's not always clear what constitutes a "different interface" (and hence should have a different index), and when this is the continuation of an existing interface (and hence the index should remain the same). I've got a vague recollection of a suggestion that this behaviour should be controlled by a configure option, but it's not immediately apparent whether this was ever done. The one thing that confuses me is that Luis seems to be seeing *both* the old and new indexes. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users