Re: Terabyte Patch
UMV <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <op.u8cd751w4nq2kr@backtrack> |
Thanks Mike. That addresses part one of my Q. Part 2 is: Does Net-SNMP 5.5 still choke (incorrectly report) on multi-terabyte rigs? (I'm assuming it does, but I'm looking for confirmation from those with more familiarity.) -=dwh=- On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:31:24 -0800, Mike Ayers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: UMV [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:17 PM > >> Has "Patches item #2340904" (Summary: dskTable: dskTotal / dskAvail / >> dskUsed overflow-prone)been incorporated into the current net-snmp 5.5 >> distribution, or will I have to patch it myself when I roll my own >> packages? >> >> OR (crosses fingers), >> >> If the overflow issue has been addressed, can I just go ahead and use >> the >> 5.5 binary .rpms on a rig with a 24TB array? > > It appears that patch has not been incorporated into any release, or > even tested by anyone else. I suspect there is still a lack of the >2TB > drives needed for testing... > > > HTH, > > Mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users