RE: set request received more than once.

Tanisha Kashyap <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <6894FC628111D84DBD7ECCA18E47E3B3013B2119@GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM>
There is only var in my MIB on which I can do a set.

The code under RESERVE1 and RESERVE2 is just validating the data received in the request for correct datatype and range.
The code under ACTION is the main code which is invoking a function.

So I believe that all the cases are executed again for the SET request.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:49 PM
To: Tanisha Kashyap
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: set request received more than once.

On 24 February 2010 11:09, Tanisha Kashyap <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have defined the following cases in my code for the SET REQUEST:
>
> MODE_SET_RESERVE1
> MODE_SET_RESERVE2
> MODE_SET_FREE -> does nothing
> MODE_SET_ACTION
> MODE_SET_COMMIT -> does nothing
> MODE_SET_UNDO -> does nothing
>
> The function that is invoked multiple times is defined under the MODE_SET_ACTION case.
>
> Since I have defined all the cases for the Set request so the function under MODE_SET_ACTION
> case shouldn't be invoked more than once.
>
> Is my thought correct?

That sounds right, yes.
If your routine is *only* being called multiple times for the ACTION pass,
and not for the earlier ones, then that sounds like an issue with the
agent processing.
   (Since a re-sent SET request would start again with RESERVE1)

That sounds a very odd situation, though - since I'd expect to have heard
of such problems before now.   What version of the agent are you using?
Does this happen for all SET requests, or just particular OIDs?

Dave

"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.