question about Re: About net-snmp table iterator performance

Hi -

In your reply to note in title, you said:

There is a flag that can improve performance if the internal
indexing matches the SNMP ordering, but it's still probably
not the most efficient of the helpers.

 Where is the flag and when do I set it?  I have the iterate_access code
working now so I may stick with this for small tables.

You also said:

My best advice is to use a different helper!

For a (larger) table of data that is in the kernel or a database or
somewhere else external, which helper do you recommend?  My guess is the
mfd using the cache-handler but not entirely sure.

Thanks.

Kathy McLeod
Dept S82  CCB - SNMP
IBM Rochester, MN
(507) 253-4803


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users