RE: SNMPWALK works for the table, but SNMPGET doesn't work
X Z <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, I did use snmpget for individual entry in the table. E.g. I did snmpwalk to get the following: MY-MIB::myTableEntry1.1=1 MY-MIB::myTableEntry2.1=xxx ... MY-MIB::myTableEntry1.2=2 MY-MIB::myTableEntry2.2=yyy Then I use snmpget for MY-MIB::myTableEntry1.1, it gave me "no such instance currently exists at this oid" error. Anyone knows the reason? Thanks Xuan > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SNMPWALK works for the table, but SNMPGET doesn't work > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:28:11 -0700 > > >>>>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:03:47 -0400, X Z <[email protected]> said: > > XZ> I implemented a MIB table and I can do a snmpwalk on my > XZ> table. SNMPGETNEXT works too. But I cannot perform snmpget on the > XZ> table entry. Does anyone know what might be wrong? > > XZ> snmpget ....... MY-MIB::myTableEntry1.1 > > snmpget can only be used to query an individual entry in the table, not > the whole table. > -- > Wes Hardaker > Cobham Analytic Solutions _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users