Re: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotifications
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2010/3/29 X Z <[email protected]>: > I finally can receive link up/down traps. But here is the strange behavior: > 1. link up/down traps only sent after the snmpd is restarted. If I don't > restart snmpd, there were no link up/down traps sent. > 2. There were too many link up/down traps after snmpd is restarted. I > usually saw 3 link up traps and 6 link down traps even if I only brought > down and up the interface once. > 3. There were only one coldStart trap and one nsShutdown trap as expected. > Does anyone know the reason? I search the email archives and seems that > other people had the same issue before, and one response to the problem was > that's expected behavior. I don't quite understand why the above behavior > happened? > Does anyone know how to make link up/down traps work? Are you still using your own "monitor"/"event" definitions? Have you tried using the built-in implementation of these traps? (i.e. "linkUpDownNotifications yes") Which version of the agent are you using? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users