=?windows-1256?Q?RE:_Strang?= =?windows-1256?Q?e_behavior?= =?windows-1256?Q?_on_linkUp?= =?windows-1256?Q?DownNotifi?= =?windows-1256?Q?cations=FE?=

I tried snmp 5.3.3 on both 64 bits and 32 bits servers, and the link traps only partially worked for 32 bits server. By "partially", I mean that the agent didn't take the frequency and -S option, it just simply used the default one (one minute) and didn't suppress the traps at the agent startup.
I had the following in snmpd.confnotificationEvent  linkUpTrap    linkUp   ifIndex ifAdminStatus ifOperStatusnotificationEvent  linkDownTrap  linkDown ifIndex ifAdminStatus ifOperStatusmonitor -S -r 10 -e linkUpTrap   "Generate linkUp" ifOperStatus != 2monitor -S -r 10 -e linkDownTrap "Generate linkDown" ifOperStatus == 2

ThanksXuan
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotificationsأ¾
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:52:50 -0400








I just tried snmp 5.3.3 and couldn't get the link traps working. Same behavior observed. A bunch of link up/down traps when the agent started up or restarted. After that, even I change the interface to be down by "ifdown eth2", no traps were sent out.
ThanksXuan 

> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:19:16 +0100
> Subject: Re: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotificationsأ¾
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> 
> 2010/3/29 X Z <[email protected]>:
> > I finally can receive link up/down traps. But here is the strange behavior:
> > 1. link up/down traps only sent after the snmpd is restarted.  If I don't
> > restart snmpd, there were no link up/down traps sent.
> > 2. There were too many link up/down traps after snmpd is restarted. I
> > usually saw 3 link up traps and 6 link down traps even if I only brought
> > down and up the interface once.
> > 3. There were only one coldStart trap and one nsShutdown trap as expected.
> > Does anyone know the reason? I search the email archives and seems that
> > other people had the same issue before, and one response to the problem was
> > that's expected behavior. I don't quite understand why the above behavior
> > happened?
> > Does anyone know how to make link up/down traps work?
> 
> 
> Are you still using your own "monitor"/"event" definitions?
> Have you tried using the built-in implementation of these traps?
>   (i.e. "linkUpDownNotifications yes")
> 
> Which version of the agent are you using?
> 
> Dave
 		 	   		  
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users