=?windows-1256?Q?RE:_Strang?= =?windows-1256?Q?e_behavior?= =?windows-1256?Q?_on_linkUp?= =?windows-1256?Q?DownNotifi?= =?windows-1256?Q?cations=FE?=

Both machines are loaded with same modules, but in different order. 
ThanksXuan

> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:10:12 +0100
> Subject: Re: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotificationsأ¾
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> 
> 2010/4/7 X Z <[email protected]>:
> > The working one (see link up down traps) has the following output:
> > trap: send_trap -1 -1 NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs.10
> 
> > The nonworking one has the following output:
> > trap: send_trap -1 -1 NET-SNMP-TC::linux
> 
> These actually both refer to the same OID.
> 
> 
> > Any ideas why the two different MIBs are used?
> 
> Have a look at both what MIBs are installed on the two systems,
> and what MIBs are actually *loaded*.
>    The debug flag 'parse-mibs' might be useful for this.
> 
> 
> Though I've no idea why this might affect linkUp/Down traps.
> 
> Dave
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users