Re: net-snmp compilation problem still unresolved

Hi Bart,

Thanks for the command. I could see the debug messages now.
I have added a new MIB. To add those objects to snmpd.
Do i need to do configure again?. Is there any other way to do this.
Please let me know.

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Group <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> My Configuration:
>>
>> net-snmp version: net-snmp-5.4.2.1
>> environment: cygwin
>> operating system: windows XP
>>
>>
>> Now i would like to run the snmp agent on windows.
>>
>> I created a snmpd.conf file in /usr/local/share/snmp
>> with following entry:
>>
>> rocommunity  private
>>
>> When i tried to do a snmpget i'm getting the following error.
>> $ snmpget -c private localhost sysUpTime
>> Timeout: No Response from localhost.
>>
>
> I assume that sysUpTime should have been sysUpTime.0 ? Anyway, the timeout
> error message means that there is either a network problem, a problem with
> the configuration of snmpd or that snmpd was not running.
>
>
>> and when i do a snmpget for netSnmpExampleInteger, i'm getting the
>> following error: (i have compiled this by
>> including in ./configure ... -with-mib-modules"examples/
>> static_int")
>> $ snmpget -c private localhost netSnmpExampleInteger.0
>> netSnmpExampleInteger.0: Unknown Object Identifier (Sub-id not found:
>> (top) -> netSnmpExampleInteger
>> )
>>
>> I'm not sure whether snmp agent is running or not. How can i check this.
>> I make sure that snmp port is not blocked (I allowed UDP port 161 in
>> firewall settings).
>>
>
> You can debug the access control setup of snmpd together with the network
> setup as follows:
> * Start snmpd with packet tracing enabled, e.g. as follows:
>     agent/snmpd -Mmibs -f -d -Lo
> * Run snmpgetnext in another shell, e.g. as follows:
>     apps/snmpgetnext -Mmibs -cprivate localhost .1
> * Inspect the snmpd output. If no output is printed, this means that the
> UDP packets sent by snmpgetnext do not arrive at snmpd and hence that the
> network setup should be inspected. If snmpd reports that it received the
> packets sent by snmpgetnext but did not send any packets back, then there is
> a mismatch between the access control information passed to snmpgetnext and
> the access control information in snmpd.conf. If snmpd reports that it
> received and sent packets, then this means that the access control
> information passed to snmpgetnext and snmpd did match.
>
> An example of how the snmpd output should look like (on a Linux system):
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Received 37 byte packet from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:60541->[127.0.0.1]
> 0000: 30 23 02 01  01 04 07 70  72 69 76 61  74 65 A1 15
> 0#.....private..
> 0016: 02 04 46 52  36 BF 02 01  00 02 01 00  30 07 30 05
> ..FR6.......0.0.
> 0032: 06 01 01 05  00                                       .....
>
> Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:60541->[127.0.0.1]
>   GETNEXT message
>     -- ccitt.1
>
> Sending 119 bytes to UDP: [127.0.0.1]:60541->[127.0.0.1]
> 0000: 30 75 02 01  01 04 07 70  72 69 76 61  74 65 A2 67
> 0u.....private.g
> 0016: 02 04 46 52  36 BF 02 01  00 02 01 00  30 59 30 57
> ..FR6.......0Y0W
> 0032: 06 08 2B 06  01 02 01 01  01 00 04 4B  4C 69 6E 75
> ..+........KLinu
> 0048: 78 20 61 73  75 73 20 32  2E 36 2E 33  33 2E 32 2D    x asus
> 2.6.33.2-
> 0064: 73 63 73 74  20 23 31 20  53 4D 50 20  50 52 45 45    scst #1 SMP
> PREE
> 0080: 4D 50 54 20  53 61 74 20  41 70 72 20  33 20 32 31    MPT Sat Apr 3
> 21
> 0096: 3A 31 30 3A  35 38 20 43  45 53 54 20  32 30 31 30    :10:58 CEST
> 2010
> 0112: 20 78 38 36  5F 36 34                                  x86_64
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Bart.
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users