Re: Delay in processing get next request for host MIB tree
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13 May 2010 05:27, A Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> What happens if you compare the response times of >> >> snmpget ... hrMemorySize.0 >> and >> snmpgetnext .... hrMemorySize > > Response time of both OIDs is immediate. Hmmm.... that would tend to indicate the delay is associated with traversing the end of the hrSystem group, rather than hrMemorySize itself. To confirm this, please try the following queries, and report back as to the presence or absence of a delay: - snmpgetnext hrSystemMaxProcesses.0 ; snmpgetnext hrSystemMaxProcesses.0 (i.e. run the same query twice in rapid succession - does the delay appear both times?) - snmpgetnext hrSystem.8 - snmpgetnext hrStorage You original message implies that this was a widespread problem affecting the whole of the host group. But above you state that getnext on hrMemorySize is reporting back promptly. Which MIB object(s) are affected by this problem? If you walk the whole of the host subtree, where do the delays appear? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users