Re: Two snmp questions
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sparta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:33:21 -0400, X Z <[email protected]> said: XZ> Is the last line expected behavior since it is the last MIB loaded? Yes XZ> How to check the order of all loaded MIBs? The NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB::nsModuleTable will tell you all the registered MIBs if it's a net-snmp agent. XZ> 2. From the man page of snmpd.conf, it supports Process XZ> Monitoring. To enable it, simply adding "proc xxx" where xxx is XZ> the process name to snmpd.conf.I tried on Net-SNMP 5.5, it worked XZ> fine with short process names. For example a process name is XZ> httpd, sshd, etc. But for a longer process name, it doesn't XZ> support it. Like a name as "MyOwnCustomizedProcess", snmpwalk on XZ> the prTable always returns that process not running even the XZ> process is running. If I shortened the process name to be XZ> MyProcess, then it can be reported correctly. Is it a known bug XZ> for Net-SNMP? Any solution available if I don't want to change XZ> the name of the process? Much of the 'proc' support may come from the output of other commands like 'ps'. If that's the case, it's likely ps that is the limiting factor. The true and proper, however, is OS dependent. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users