Re: cache problems with table data mib2c

Hi -

I said that wrong.  I meant should I add it to all the Reserve1 sections
for the other columns (vs. the the action section, for example).  That
error code is what mib2c generated for the get section, so I went with
that.

Thanks.


Kathy McLeod
Dept S82  CCB - SNMP
IBM Rochester, MN
(507) 253-4803


                                                                           
             Dave Shield                                                   
             <D.T.Shield@liver                                             
             pool.ac.uk>                                                To 
             Sent by:                  Kathy McLeod/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS    
             dave.shield@googl                                          cc 
             email.com                 net-snmp users                      
                                       <[email protected] 
                                       et>                                 
             06/17/2010 02:47                                      Subject 
             AM                        Re: cache problems with table data  
                                       mib2c                               
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




On 16 June 2010 20:14, Kathy McLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
> Problem 1:  When I tried to do a set for a row that doesn't exist, I was
> getting a seg. fault (I was seeing set handler 4 debug msg but not the
next
> one).  I added that check from the get section to the switch for the
> PortConfigStatus set section, and now it fails nicely (set handler 1b
debug
> msg).  Is this the correct check?

Basically, yes - though the correct error code is actually
'SNMP_ERR_NOCREATION'

>  Should I add it to all the column set sections

No - handling this in MODE_SET_RESERVE1 should be sufficient.
(The agent will then call 'MODE_SET_FREE', so that code would also
 need to be ready to handle a missing row.  But since that particular
 block is empty here, there's no problem!)

Dave



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users