RE: Processing traps
"Joseph L. Casale" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA5A491E9DEFBE4CB777DE97E21575E906942C37@prato.activenetwerx.local> |
>Shouldn't that be > snmptrap ..... 6 23 .... > rather than .... 5 23 ..... >? Whoops, yes, I did mean 6/23. So does it make sense to use .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.6 for both the enterprise-oid and the OID like this: snmptrap -v 1 -c public nms.domain.com .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.6 "" 6 23 "" \ .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.6 s "text..." \ .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.6 s "text..." \ .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.6 s "text..." \ Or is there something more suitable for the OID if I am just needing to send text in the trap? Thanks for the time Dave! jlc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users