Re: unregistering handlers
Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Leo Cacciari <[email protected]>wrote: > [ ... ] > > Calling netsnmp_handler_registration_free from > netsnmp_unregister_handler can be, as I stated, either a bug or a > feature, but in any case I think it should be advertised in the > documentation. Anyhow, this answer my own question: yes, unregistering > handlers is enough for avoiding memory leaks (at least those related to > surviving handler registration structures). > As far as I know this is the intended behavior. But you are right, this should be documented. I'll have a look at documenting this on the trunk (which will become version 5.7 ?). Bart. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users