Re: snmpv3 context question
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22 December 2010 06:13, aravind narasimhan <[email protected]> wrote: > The application > that is polling both these agents can poll the agent on port 161 but > gets no response from snmpd. I wrote a test program where i reverse > the order and snmpwalk from snmpd oid followed by a walk on the > proprietary agent things work. Try running the proprietary agent on another port, with the Net-SNMP agent on port 161, and use the "proxy" directive (in N/S snmpd.conf) to redirect selected requests to the proprietary agent. That way, everything looks like a single agent to the monitoring application, and it doesn't need to worry about having two, > Do you think context is the issue in the case i have described? No Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users