Re: Correct getnext behavior?
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4 January 2011 22:33, Webb, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > What would be the expected result set for a query on “…9.1.1.14” A GetNext query (from either snmpgetnext or snmpwalk) should return the value for ....9.1.1.14.1.0 > I am expecting a “walk” or “getnext” operation to yield the “…9.1.1.14.1.0” OID. Indeed. > Instead, when I use snmpwalk I get “No such instance currently exists > at the OID”, and when I use snmpgetnext I am given OID “…9.1.1.1.1.0”, which > even though it is a valid OID, it isn’t lexicographically next in line. Given this snmpgetnext response, that would explain why snmpwalk returns nothing. (Since the varbind that it receives lies outside the requested range). So the fundamental issue is why you're getting the wrong answer for the GetNext request. Is this OID part of the standard agent, or is it a MIB module that you have developed yourself? > Is either one of these results a normally expected behavior? No. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users