RE: Correct getnext behavior?
"Webb, Eric" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is part of a MIB from Phonetics for one of their Sensaphone environmental monitoring products. My understanding is that their appliance is actually Linux-based and uses net-snmp (though unknown version). I tend to think the error is in their agent and have simultaneously raised the question with them. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:49 AM To: Webb, Eric Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Correct getnext behavior? > Instead, when I use snmpwalk I get "No such instance currently exists > at the OID", and when I use snmpgetnext I am given OID "...9.1.1.1.1.0", which > even though it is a valid OID, it isn't lexicographically next in line. Given this snmpgetnext response, that would explain why snmpwalk returns nothing. (Since the varbind that it receives lies outside the requested range). So the fundamental issue is why you're getting the wrong answer for the GetNext request. Is this OID part of the standard agent, or is it a MIB module that you have developed yourself? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users