Re: Monitoring "CPU steal"?
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sparta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:01:19 -0800, Krisztian Mizser <[email protected]> said: KM> Pardon my ignorance, but who's responsible for changing the MIBs to KM> support new features as technology advances? That's ok! MIBs that exist in the enterprise space are "private", or appropriately, "controlled by the author". This is the case for all the MIBs under the enterprise tree (like where net-snmp has a mib node it controls everything else, as does hp, sun, linksys, etc...). Then the IETF controls MIBs that are published in the standardized RFCs. To get them updated it takes a fairly complicated process to get multiple vendors, etc, to agree on the "standard way to do it". No one, that I know of, has put forth the effort to get the standardized host resources mib updated with modern notions like multiple cores, etc. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users