Re: exec directive support confusion
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 26 April 2011 20:24, Kelsey Cummings <[email protected]> wrote: > We are in the process of getting RHEL6 ready for use and have run into a > problem with exec support. However they've got 5.5 configured, exec > directives are not actually used. Are you using entries of the form exec name command or exec OID name command ? The first form should work regardless. The second form has been deprecated (not least because the output structure is invalid!) Ideally, you look at moving to use the "extend" directive instead. This is a much more flexible mechanism, which is also not dependent on the order of entries within the snmpd.conf file(s). > However, it will be far > easier for us to migrate if we we can use all of the existing code and > configs. It's not clear to me what option should be passed into snmpd > at compile time to enable the old exec behavior. Try --with-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/exec Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users