Re: exec directive support confusion
Kelsey Cummings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:35:57PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On 26 April 2011 20:24, Kelsey Cummings <[email protected]> wrote: > > We are in the process of getting RHEL6 ready for use and have run into a > > problem with exec support. ?However they've got 5.5 configured, exec > > directives are not actually used. > > Are you using entries of the form > > exec name command > or > exec OID name command > ? > > The first form should work regardless. > The second form has been deprecated > (not least because the output structure is invalid!) We're using the totally broken and totally deprecated exec OID format - we know we should use extend it would just be a PITA to migrate 350+ hosts running different generations of snmpd and OSes all over to the new format. And/Or, update all of the pollers to understand and automatically switch between both outputs. > > However, it will be far > > easier for us to migrate if we we can use all of the existing code and > > configs. ?It's not clear to me what option should be passed into snmpd > > at compile time to enable the old exec behavior. > > Try > --with-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/exec I'll give that a shot, thanks! -- Kelsey Cummings - [email protected] sonic.net, inc. System Architect 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 Santa Rosa, CA 95407 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users